Before 2020, election experts warned voting machines were insecure and vulnerable to hacking, with many cases showing hackers could change results. Despite claims of a secure election in 2020, reports and experts still highlight risks like malware, internet connections, and software breaches. Many see election security as a serious threat to democracy.
Thread: Let’s find out what the election experts said before they became establishment shills after the 2020 most secure election in the history of elections. @elonmusk
First up, the 2016 election hacking experience was a national security threat.
Politicians, spies and hackers use malware to steal votes and influence foreign elections.
Back when fraudits were still considered audits.
“There has been much pre-election talk about the supposed danger of postal voting, but a far more realistic threat comes from hackers attacking electronic voting machines.”
President Barack Obama has ordered a full review into hacking aimed at influencing US elections going back to 2008, the White House said Friday.
Let’s see what the foremost election security expert has to say. Oh, I know. Voting machines can be hacked.
Hacking U.S. elections might be easier than you think.
In every single case where a voting machine has been analyzed by competent security experts, they have found vulnerabilities that would let someone inject software and change election data.
Elections are under assault across the globe, as we continually see in the news. Well-resourced malicious cyber actors have tampered with our elections, whether it’s hacking voting machines or waging information warfare through social media.
Voting machines are connected to the internet? Nah. That can’t be true.
Oh my. Look at all of those democrat election deniers.
A document for modem transmissions from voting machines made by Dominion Voting Systems—another top voting machine company in the country—similarly discusses TCP-IP and SSL, both protocols used for internet traffic.
Our voting systems and election infrastructure are vulnerable at multiple points and we must take steps to harden election technology of all kinds — not just voting machines — against tampering and failures.
2016: Voting machine vulnerabilities are a national security threat.
2020: Moat secure election in the history of history.
Gee, what’s the difference?
More democrat election deniers.
SMART Elections held a Senate Briefing to show Senators that votes on electronic voting machines are not secure.
You don’t say.
Dan Rather is an election denier.
Nah.
Mayor Cavalier Johnson on Thursday, Nov. 3 announced the Milwaukee Election Commission's deputy director has been fired.
Interview discussing how the hacker @CyberZeist was able to penetrate Alaska's election system in 2016.
A real-time demo of the most devastating election theft mechanism yet found.
Remember when everyone hated hanging chads and wanted computerized voting? Seemed like a good idea at the time.
A fractional voting framework is treacherous because it can be scaled to run across multiple jurisdictions very quickly. False results precisely mimic known patterns to appear plausible.
“...found Diebold software – which the company refuses to make available for public inspection, on the grounds that it's proprietary– on an unprotected server, where anyone could download it...This in itself was an incredible breach of security...” Paul Krugman NYT
This is the hack that proved America's elections can be stolen using a few lines of computer code. The 'Hursti Hack' in this video is an excerpt from the feature length Emmy nominated documentary 'Hacking Democracy'.
"... the tampering would affect the outcome of the
election and not be detected by the subsequent canvass procedures."
"The shocking film that proves America's elections can be stolen using a few lines of computer code. "
Thread: Let’s find out what the election experts said before they became establishment shills after the 2020 most secure election in the history of elections. @elonmuskFirst up, the 2016 election hacking experience was a national security threat.Putin won the 2016 US presidential election which caused gridlock in DC, aka democrats didn’t have one party rule.Politicians, spies and hackers use malware to steal votes and influence foreign elections.Back when fraudits were still considered audits.“There has been much pre-election talk about the supposed danger of postal voting, but a far more realistic threat comes from hackers attacking electronic voting machines.”President Barack Obama has ordered a full review into hacking aimed at influencing US elections going back to 2008, the White House said Friday.“Voting machines have got to go.”Voting Village presents a report on cyber vulnerabilities in US election equipment, databases, and infrastructure.Our voting machines are not secure and are a threat to democracy.Let’s see what the foremost election security expert has to say. Oh, I know. Voting machines can be hacked.Hacking U.S. elections might be easier than you think.In every single case where a voting machine has been analyzed by competent security experts, they have found vulnerabilities that would let someone inject software and change election data.
EVERY SINGLE CASE.Elections are under assault across the globe, as we continually see in the news. Well-resourced malicious cyber actors have tampered with our elections, whether it’s hacking voting machines or waging information warfare through social media.Voting machines are connected to the internet? Nah. That can’t be true.Oh my. Look at all of those democrat election deniers.A document for modem transmissions from voting machines made by Dominion Voting Systems—another top voting machine company in the country—similarly discusses TCP-IP and SSL, both protocols used for internet traffic.Our voting systems and election infrastructure are vulnerable at multiple points and we must take steps to harden election technology of all kinds — not just voting machines — against tampering and failures.2016: Voting machine vulnerabilities are a national security threat.
2020: Moat secure election in the history of history.
Gee, what’s the difference?More democrat election deniers.SMART Elections held a Senate Briefing to show Senators that votes on electronic voting machines are not secure.You don’t say.Dan Rather is an election denier.Nah.Mayor Cavalier Johnson on Thursday, Nov. 3 announced the Milwaukee Election Commission's deputy director has been fired.Interview discussing how the hacker @CyberZeist was able to penetrate Alaska's election system in 2016.A real-time demo of the most devastating election theft mechanism yet found.Remember when everyone hated hanging chads and wanted computerized voting? Seemed like a good idea at the time.Bloomberg technology: Voting machines are bad and can be hacked.A fractional voting framework is treacherous because it can be scaled to run across multiple jurisdictions very quickly. False results precisely mimic known patterns to appear plausible.“...found Diebold software – which the company refuses to make available for public inspection, on the grounds that it's proprietary– on an unprotected server, where anyone could download it...This in itself was an incredible breach of security...” Paul Krugman NYTThis is the hack that proved America's elections can be stolen using a few lines of computer code. The 'Hursti Hack' in this video is an excerpt from the feature length Emmy nominated documentary 'Hacking Democracy'."... the tampering would affect the outcome of the
election and not be detected by the subsequent canvass procedures."
UC Berkeley, election deniersYou can change the results of an election by tampering with the memory card.
You don't say."The shocking film that proves America's elections can be stolen using a few lines of computer code. "
yes
Thread: Let’s find out what the election experts said before they became establishment shills after the 2020 most secure election in the history of elections. @elonmusk ... First up, the 2016 election hacking experience was a national security threat. ... Putin won the 2016 US presidential election which caused gridlock in DC, aka democrats didn’t have one party rule. ... Politicians, spies and hackers use malware to steal votes and influence foreign elections. ... Back when fraudits were still considered audits. ... “There has been much pre-election talk about the supposed danger of postal voting, but a far more realistic threat comes from hackers attacking electronic voting machines.” ... President Barack Obama has ordered a full review into hacking aimed at influencing US elections going back to 2008, the White House said Friday. ... “Voting machines have got to go.” ... Voting Village presents a report on cyber vulnerabilities in US election equipment, databases, and infrastructure. ... Our voting machines are not secure and are a threat to democracy. ... Let’s see what the foremost election security expert has to say. Oh, I know. Voting machines can be hacked. ... Hacking U.S. elections might be easier than you think. ... In every single case where a voting machine has been analyzed by competent security experts, they have found vulnerabilities that would let someone inject software and change election data.
EVERY SINGLE CASE. ... Elections are under assault across the globe, as we continually see in the news. Well-resourced malicious cyber actors have tampered with our elections, whether it’s hacking voting machines or waging information warfare through social media. ... Voting machines are connected to the internet? Nah. That can’t be true. ... Oh my. Look at all of those democrat election deniers. ... A document for modem transmissions from voting machines made by Dominion Voting Systems—another top voting machine company in the country—similarly discusses TCP-IP and SSL, both protocols used for internet traffic. ... Our voting systems and election infrastructure are vulnerable at multiple points and we must take steps to harden election technology of all kinds — not just voting machines — against tampering and failures. ... 2016: Voting machine vulnerabilities are a national security threat.
2020: Moat secure election in the history of history.
Gee, what’s the difference? ... More democrat election deniers. ... SMART Elections held a Senate Briefing to show Senators that votes on electronic voting machines are not secure. ... You don’t say. ... Dan Rather is an election denier. ... Nah. ... Mayor Cavalier Johnson on Thursday, Nov. 3 announced the Milwaukee Election Commission's deputy director has been fired. ... Interview discussing how the hacker @CyberZeist was able to penetrate Alaska's election system in 2016. ... A real-time demo of the most devastating election theft mechanism yet found. ... Remember when everyone hated hanging chads and wanted computerized voting? Seemed like a good idea at the time. ... Bloomberg technology: Voting machines are bad and can be hacked. ... A fractional voting framework is treacherous because it can be scaled to run across multiple jurisdictions very quickly. False results precisely mimic known patterns to appear plausible. ... “...found Diebold software – which the company refuses to make available for public inspection, on the grounds that it's proprietary– on an unprotected server, where anyone could download it...This in itself was an incredible breach of security...” Paul Krugman NYT ... ... This is the hack that proved America's elections can be stolen using a few lines of computer code. The 'Hursti Hack' in this video is an excerpt from the feature length Emmy nominated documentary 'Hacking Democracy'. ... "... the tampering would affect the outcome of the
election and not be detected by the subsequent canvass procedures."
UC Berkeley, election deniers ... You can change the results of an election by tampering with the memory card.
You don't say. ... "The shocking film that proves America's elections can be stolen using a few lines of computer code. "
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
Update
