Why would any woman compete in a boxing match with someone who remains a male? It’s one thing to pretend and be politically correct when it doesn’t cost you broken bones. But given the foreseeability of that kind of danger, why would any thinking woman go through with it? (1/)

The answer is: the same reason any female athlete goes through with competing against a biologically male opponent: the fear of being called a transphobe and a bigot—the fear of being canceled and shamed into oblivion for refusing to play pretend. (2/)

It used to be that pressuring a woman to subject herself to being battered by a mentally ill man was called abuse. Now, apparently, it’s called feminism. (3/)

That’s the most stupefying thing of it all. This is all done in the name of liberating women from oppression, but in reality, you couldn’t 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯 a system more oppressive to women. (4/)

Let men into women’s sports, where they are at an unfair disadvantage; into women’s locker rooms and bathrooms, where their privacy is invaded; into women’s prisons, where criminals can prey on women who have no way to protect themselves. It is absolute lunacy. (5/)

For all the talk about wanting to “smash the patriarchy,” the woman of the year, the best female college swimmer, the best female fighters, the first female four-star admiral in the Public Health Service—are all men. (6/)

What’s the message these feminists are trying to send? that men are better than women even at being women? It sure seems like transgenderism ensures that the patriarchy always wins in the end. (7/)

In fact, that observation has led one social commentator to say: “Hard truth: the trans movement 𝘪𝘴 the patriarchy. Just in makeup and heels.” It’s time to end the nonsense. (8/8)