did you know that Platonism is a metaphysical blanket to make one feel comfortable, even though the implications of Platonism have terrified people across history? it's true because naturalists with trauma project this state onto everyone else. especially Humeans,
who do not take theoretical reason sufficiently seriously. oh, but excuse me, no argument, no slice of evidence, can *ever* change the mind of naturalists. i'll meet these epistemically vicious people half-way: what psychologically motivates my anti-naturalism,
as distinct from Platonism proper, is hatred. hatred of metastatic rape of human thought: the conceptual atrocities i have seen naturalists commit across the centuries. your vague creed is profane, sickly, unholy, and only one-step removed from theistic dogma.
for, if you scratch a theist, you often find that they ultimately cannot accept non-causal explanations: they always need some fundamental causal agent to order things. just as the naturalist does: just in a /far/ more deflationary sense.
atheistic metaphilosophical non-naturalism is the liberation of human thought from damaging thought-memes like theistic conceptual hijacking and hypocritical, relentlessly scholastic delusions that 'inflationary' metaphysical posits are akin to believing ectoplasm.
of course, they cannot defend themselves on academic and theoretical grounds. which is why they are routinely childish — cf. Dennett as one good example — who tell flights of fantasy about their opponents.
(like how Dennett believes that people are substance dualists because they're egotistic.) oh, it is so tiresome. can this intellectual bandwagon die so that human enlightenment can begin?
naturalism and theism must be buried in the same grave; a transhistorical indictment due to intellectual lessons that proved them the wrong ideals.
did you know that Platonism is a metaphysical blanket to make one feel comfortable, even though the implications of Platonism have terrified people across history? it's true because naturalists with trauma project this state onto everyone else. especially Humeans,who do not take theoretical reason sufficiently seriously. oh, but excuse me, no argument, no slice of evidence, can *ever* change the mind of naturalists. i'll meet these epistemically vicious people half-way: what psychologically motivates my anti-naturalism,as distinct from Platonism proper, is hatred. hatred of metastatic rape of human thought: the conceptual atrocities i have seen naturalists commit across the centuries. your vague creed is profane, sickly, unholy, and only one-step removed from theistic dogma.for, if you scratch a theist, you often find that they ultimately cannot accept non-causal explanations: they always need some fundamental causal agent to order things. just as the naturalist does: just in a /far/ more deflationary sense.atheistic metaphilosophical non-naturalism is the liberation of human thought from damaging thought-memes like theistic conceptual hijacking and hypocritical, relentlessly scholastic delusions that 'inflationary' metaphysical posits are akin to believing ectoplasm.of course, they cannot defend themselves on academic and theoretical grounds. which is why they are routinely childish — cf. Dennett as one good example — who tell flights of fantasy about their opponents.(like how Dennett believes that people are substance dualists because they're egotistic.) oh, it is so tiresome. can this intellectual bandwagon die so that human enlightenment can begin?naturalism and theism must be buried in the same grave; a transhistorical indictment due to intellectual lessons that proved them the wrong ideals.
did you know that Platonism is a metaphysical blanket to make one feel comfortable, even though the implications of Platonism have terrified people across history? it's true because naturalists with trauma project this state onto everyone else. especially Humeans, ... who do not take theoretical reason sufficiently seriously. oh, but excuse me, no argument, no slice of evidence, can *ever* change the mind of naturalists. i'll meet these epistemically vicious people half-way: what psychologically motivates my anti-naturalism, ... as distinct from Platonism proper, is hatred. hatred of metastatic rape of human thought: the conceptual atrocities i have seen naturalists commit across the centuries. your vague creed is profane, sickly, unholy, and only one-step removed from theistic dogma. ... for, if you scratch a theist, you often find that they ultimately cannot accept non-causal explanations: they always need some fundamental causal agent to order things. just as the naturalist does: just in a /far/ more deflationary sense. ... atheistic metaphilosophical non-naturalism is the liberation of human thought from damaging thought-memes like theistic conceptual hijacking and hypocritical, relentlessly scholastic delusions that 'inflationary' metaphysical posits are akin to believing ectoplasm. ... of course, they cannot defend themselves on academic and theoretical grounds. which is why they are routinely childish — cf. Dennett as one good example — who tell flights of fantasy about their opponents. ... (like how Dennett believes that people are substance dualists because they're egotistic.) oh, it is so tiresome. can this intellectual bandwagon die so that human enlightenment can begin? ... naturalism and theism must be buried in the same grave; a transhistorical indictment due to intellectual lessons that proved them the wrong ideals.
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
Update
