PSA: Most biglab people now read almost zero papers and understand ICLR/ICML/NeurIPS to be mainly full of overclaims & fraud. (but there are a few diamonds in the rough of course)
^ This is obvious to everyone who has connections, but I think not necessarily obvious to the majority of students who aren’t as well-connected. Therefore it should be repeated every so often
Ok I do want to soften my statement a bit. I wouldn’t claim that the numerical majority of papers in these conferences are overclaiming or fraudulent. It’s more like, as a reader, if you select for the papers that seem most exciting, then those ones will be majority overclaims.
PSA: Most biglab people now read almost zero papers and understand ICLR/ICML/NeurIPS to be mainly full of overclaims & fraud. (but there are a few diamonds in the rough of course)^ This is obvious to everyone who has connections, but I think not necessarily obvious to the majority of students who aren’t as well-connected. Therefore it should be repeated every so oftenOk I do want to soften my statement a bit. I wouldn’t claim that the numerical majority of papers in these conferences are overclaiming or fraudulent. It’s more like, as a reader, if you select for the papers that seem most exciting, then those ones will be majority overclaims.
PSA: Most biglab people now read almost zero papers and understand ICLR/ICML/NeurIPS to be mainly full of overclaims & fraud. (but there are a few diamonds in the rough of course) ... ^ This is obvious to everyone who has connections, but I think not necessarily obvious to the majority of students who aren’t as well-connected. Therefore it should be repeated every so often ... Ok I do want to soften my statement a bit. I wouldn’t claim that the numerical majority of papers in these conferences are overclaiming or fraudulent. It’s more like, as a reader, if you select for the papers that seem most exciting, then those ones will be majority overclaims.
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
Update
