@MoreBirths

34.37K 237 3.43K

Listen to this Thread


View original tweet on Twitter

Hide Media

As global birthrates continue to plunge, most people still aren't aware of the severity of the crisis. A major problem is that the data sources most rely on to follow fertility trends haven't kept up with the dramatic decline of recent years. Important 🧵, please share!

First, Argentina. Official data for 2022 show Argentina fertility at 1.36. The source is RENAPER: Registro Nacional de las Personas - the agency in 🇦🇷 that is responsible for vital statistics. Part of the Argentine Ministry of the Interior. (2/11) https://t.co/AwyCbxPtsh

Fertility in Argentina collapsed rapidly from ~2.2 in 2014 and was likely ~1.3 in 2023. Yet the UN, Worldbank and Statista each still report Argentine fertility at around 1.9 births per woman. And the CIA Factbook and Macrotrends still report the ten-year-old 2.2 figure! (3/11)

Chile is the next example. Like Argentina, it has seen a catastrophic fertility drop. The account @BirthGauge, which has been following Chilean national statistics carefully, estimates 2023 TFR at 1.25. (4/11) https://t.co/v5udRhBYFa

But if you Google 'Chile fertility rate' you will get very out-of-date Worldbank numbers together with Argentine figures that are 0.55 births per woman too high! The other sources follow and are similar. Wikipedia relies on this same group. (5/11)

Next, China. China released its official data for 2023 on January 17th. China's NBS reported 9.02 million births for a TFR of 1.02. Chinese-American demographer @fuxianyi, who was pivotal in getting China's one-child policy removed, reports: https://t.co/7vRgTE4UVt (6/11)

Many observers, including @fuxianyi, and @MoreBirths, think China's fertility numbers may be lower still, given the history of over-reporting births. But even taking China's official numbers at face value, the most relied-on sources wildly understate the Chinese collapse. (7/11)

Next, the Philippines. Helpfully the Philippine Statistics Authority published a huge report that gives TFR on page 71, at 1.9. Yet the UN, World Bank and the CIA Factbook are at ~2.7, suggesting TFR well-above replacement instead of well-below. (8/11) https://t.co/ePTpCiMzkT

What about Thailand? @BirthGauge reports 1.1 births per woman, citing Thailand's official government website. A disastrous fall to ultra-low fertility. Again, all the sources are way behind the times. (9/11) https://t.co/dxNoR3KDDf

Finally, Turkey. Demographer @masagget reports their TFR as 1.62, well below replacement, citing the Turkish government website. Meanwhile, each of the major sources is bunched around 1.9-2, implying no problem at all! (10/11) https://t.co/VjlkzAtupf

Birthrates have plunged catastrophically since 2015 in many countries, but most people don't even realize the problem yet, partly because of lagging fertility data. Here is better data by @BirthGauge. Follow @MoreBirths for more on this crisis and its solutions. (11/11)

As global birthrates continue to plunge, most people still aren't aware of the severity of the crisis. A major problem is that the data sources most rely on to follow fertility trends haven't kept up with the dramatic decline of recent years. Important 🧵, please share! First, Argentina. Official data for 2022 show Argentina fertility at 1.36. The source is RENAPER: Registro Nacional de las Personas - the agency in 🇦🇷 that is responsible for vital statistics. Part of the Argentine Ministry of the Interior. (2/11) https://t.co/AwyCbxPtsh Fertility in Argentina collapsed rapidly from ~2.2 in 2014 and was likely ~1.3 in 2023. Yet the UN, Worldbank and Statista each still report Argentine fertility at around 1.9 births per woman. And the CIA Factbook and Macrotrends still report the ten-year-old 2.2 figure! (3/11) Chile is the next example. Like Argentina, it has seen a catastrophic fertility drop. The account @BirthGauge, which has been following Chilean national statistics carefully, estimates 2023 TFR at 1.25. (4/11) https://t.co/v5udRhBYFaBut if you Google 'Chile fertility rate' you will get very out-of-date Worldbank numbers together with Argentine figures that are 0.55 births per woman too high! The other sources follow and are similar. Wikipedia relies on this same group. (5/11) Next, China. China released its official data for 2023 on January 17th. China's NBS reported 9.02 million births for a TFR of 1.02. Chinese-American demographer @fuxianyi, who was pivotal in getting China's one-child policy removed, reports: https://t.co/7vRgTE4UVt (6/11)Many observers, including @fuxianyi, and @MoreBirths, think China's fertility numbers may be lower still, given the history of over-reporting births. But even taking China's official numbers at face value, the most relied-on sources wildly understate the Chinese collapse. (7/11) Next, the Philippines. Helpfully the Philippine Statistics Authority published a huge report that gives TFR on page 71, at 1.9. Yet the UN, World Bank and the CIA Factbook are at ~2.7, suggesting TFR well-above replacement instead of well-below. (8/11) https://t.co/ePTpCiMzkT What about Thailand? @BirthGauge reports 1.1 births per woman, citing Thailand's official government website. A disastrous fall to ultra-low fertility. Again, all the sources are way behind the times. (9/11) https://t.co/dxNoR3KDDf Finally, Turkey. Demographer @masagget reports their TFR as 1.62, well below replacement, citing the Turkish government website. Meanwhile, each of the major sources is bunched around 1.9-2, implying no problem at all! (10/11) https://t.co/VjlkzAtupf Birthrates have plunged catastrophically since 2015 in many countries, but most people don't even realize the problem yet, partly because of lagging fertility data. Here is better data by @BirthGauge. Follow @MoreBirths for more on this crisis and its solutions. (11/11)

Unroll Another Tweet

Use Our Twitter Bot to Unroll a Thread

  1. 1 Give us a follow on Twitter. follow us
  2. 2 Drop a comment, mentioning us @unrollnow on the thread you want to Unroll.
  3. 3Wait For Some Time, We will reply to your comment with Unroll Link.