1) VERY good "Inside the Numbers" with @barnes_law and Richard Baris @Peoples_Pundit : 2) Multiple insiders are beginning to think Cackles is gonna lose big. Mark Halperin, on one show, between the lines said Trump is ahead in PA and can surge ahead in MI and WI & has sunbelt.

@barnes_law @Peoples_Pundit 3) He essentially hinted that Cackles will be about where Rutabaga was in a couple of weeks. 4) Barnes said that the polling just isn't picking up Trump's strength in WI & MI--as IT FAILED TO DO in 2016 & 20, and that's he's already ahead & should win by a couple in each.

@barnes_law @Peoples_Pundit 5) Halperin saying what WE ALL said at the time they ditched Rutabaga, which is Cackles brings very little new to the table while losing a lot (particularly in the midwest.) 6) People do not trust the GOP. This is why Lake, Moreno, Brown, McCormick are struggling.

@barnes_law @Peoples_Pundit 7) Those senate candidates haven't learned to grab one or two of Trump/RFK's winning issues, crypto freedom, medical freedom, and hammer their opponents with them. 8) McCormick should be tied or ahead, but won't listen to any winning strategies. Just raises money.

@barnes_law @Peoples_Pundit 9) Polling in FL is just stupid. Scott way ahead of D there, Trump at least 7-8 points up there. 10) Cackles' (quiet) Hinduism is NOT playing in middle PA. Call them any name you want but she isn't viewed as an American (raised in Canada, West Indian descent).

@barnes_law @Peoples_Pundit 11) Finally, in debates Trump can hit Cackles from BOTH sides of law and order: won't uphold the law on border and fat cats but can't wait to hit little people with jail time for weed. 12) Conclusion from inference by Halperin: Why the hell did they pick Cackles?